Armenian vs Nigerian Male Disability
COMPARE
Armenian
Nigerian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Armenians
Nigerians
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
90.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
81.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Nigerian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,935,908 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,727,494 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 1.0%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Armenian | Nigerian |
| Minimum | 5.9% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 39.5% | 27.3% |
| Range | 33.7% | 25.0% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 11.7% |
| Median | 10.9% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Armenians and Nigerians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.9%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Immigrants from Europe (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Ugandan (11.0%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |