Afghan vs Houma Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Afghan
Houma
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Afghans
Houma
10.3%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Houma Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,816,709 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 10.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,789,508 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 82.4%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Afghan | Houma |
Minimum | 2.0% | 10.2% |
Maximum | 23.5% | 57.5% |
Range | 21.5% | 47.3% |
Mean | 10.3% | 21.7% |
Median | 9.7% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 22.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 12.3% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Afghans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Lebanon (10.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Uruguayan (10.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Chilean (10.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Europe (10.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Sri Lankans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Nicaraguans | 99.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Houma by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (17.6%, a difference of 5.9%), Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 7.7%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 10.3%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 11.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |