Ute vs Sioux 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Ute
Sioux
2 or more Vehicles in Household
2 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Ute
Sioux
56.6%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
90.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
56.8%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
93.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Sioux 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,668,301 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112 and weighted average of 56.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,124,703 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.587 and weighted average of 56.8%, a difference of 0.47%.
2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Sioux |
Minimum | 32.0% | 6.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 68.0% | 93.8% |
Mean | 67.6% | 57.9% |
Median | 67.9% | 61.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 46.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.7% | 68.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.9% | 22.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 17.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.2% | 17.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Sioux by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from South Central Asia (56.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (56.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Yugoslavian (56.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Estonian (56.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Bulgarian (56.5%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Costa Rican (56.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from South Africa (56.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Native/Alaskan (57.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Asian (57.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Australian (56.7%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
Chippewa | 96.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 57.2% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 96.6 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 57.2% |
Iraqis | 95.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 57.1% |
Asians | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 57.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 95.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 57.0% |
Costa Ricans | 94.7 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 56.9% |
Sioux | 93.8 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 56.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 92.5 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 56.7% |
Australians | 91.8 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 56.7% |
New Zealanders | 91.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 56.7% |
Tsimshian | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 56.7% |
Estonians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 56.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 56.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 56.6% |
Ute | 90.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 56.6% |
Yugoslavians | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 56.6% |
Bulgarians | 89.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 56.5% |
Hungarians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 56.5% |
Comanche | 88.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 56.5% |
Immigrants | Azores | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 56.4% |
Blackfeet | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 56.4% |