Ute vs Sioux Average Family Size
COMPARE
Ute
 Sioux
 Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Ute
Sioux
3.49
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.52
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Sioux Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,658,636 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.343 and weighted average of 3.49. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,114,463 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.694 and weighted average of 3.52, a difference of 0.74%.
 
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Sioux | 
| Minimum | 2.47 | 1.60 | 
| Maximum | 5.13 | 7.63 | 
| Range | 2.66 | 6.03 | 
| Mean | 3.69 | 4.00 | 
| Median | 3.52 | 3.58 | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.19 | 3.16 | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.38 | 4.58 | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.19 | 1.41 | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.67 | 1.15 | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.66 | 1.14 | 
Demographics Similar to Ute and Sioux by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Tongan (3.49, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from El Salvador (3.49, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Central America (3.49, a difference of 0.11%), Salvadoran (3.48, a difference of 0.34%), and Mexican (3.48, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Immigrants from Mexico (3.52, a difference of 0.080%), Tohono O'odham (3.53, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Central America (3.49, a difference of 0.63%), Tongan (3.49, a difference of 0.68%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (3.49, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size | 
| Pima | 100 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.75 | 
| Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.65 | 
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.64 | 
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.63 | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.60 | 
| Hopi | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.60 | 
| Spanish American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.58 | 
| Tohono O'odham | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 3.53 | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 3.52 | 
| Sioux | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 3.52 | 
| Immigrants | Central America | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 3.49 | 
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 3.49 | 
| Ute | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 3.49 | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 3.49 | 
| Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 3.48 | 
| Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 3.48 | 
| Cheyenne | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 3.47 | 
| Yuman | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 3.47 | 
| Apache | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 3.46 | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 3.45 | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 3.45 |