Ute vs Estonian 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Ute
Estonian
2 or more Vehicles in Household
2 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Ute
Estonians
56.6%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
90.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
56.6%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
90.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Estonian 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,668,301 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112 and weighted average of 56.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,500,786 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 56.6%, a difference of 0.070%.
2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Estonian |
| Minimum | 32.0% | 26.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 68.0% | 73.9% |
| Mean | 67.6% | 65.9% |
| Median | 67.9% | 65.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 57.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.7% | 73.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.9% | 15.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.4% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.2% | 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Estonians by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from South Central Asia (56.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (56.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Yugoslavian (56.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Bulgarian (56.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Hungarian (56.5%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Immigrants from Thailand (56.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (56.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Tsimshian (56.7%, a difference of 0.080%), New Zealander (56.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Australian (56.7%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
| Iraqis | 95.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 57.1% |
| Asians | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 57.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 95.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 57.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 94.7 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 56.9% |
| Sioux | 93.8 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 56.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 92.5 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Australians | 91.8 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| New Zealanders | 91.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Tsimshian | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 56.7% |
| Estonians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Ute | 90.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Yugoslavians | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 56.6% |
| Bulgarians | 89.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Hungarians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Comanche | 88.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 56.5% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 56.4% |
| Blackfeet | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 56.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 86.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 56.3% |
| Cubans | 84.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 56.3% |