Filipino vs Hmong No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Filipino
Hmong
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Filipinos
Hmong
10.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
50.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
52.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs Hmong No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,938,776 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.507 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,678,157 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 0.36%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Filipino | Hmong |
Minimum | 0.54% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 25.0% | 37.4% |
Range | 24.5% | 36.4% |
Mean | 6.8% | 9.2% |
Median | 5.6% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 9.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and Hmong by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Sudan (10.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.4%, a difference of 0.13%), French American Indian (10.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from El Salvador (10.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Brazilian (10.4%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Immigrants from Latin America (10.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Brazilian (10.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Lumbee (10.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |
Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 60.5 /100 | #166 | Good 10.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 10.3% |
Indonesians | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 10.3% |
Lumbee | 54.7 /100 | #169 | Average 10.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 10.4% |
Hmong | 52.7 /100 | #171 | Average 10.4% |
Brazilians | 51.7 /100 | #172 | Average 10.4% |
Filipinos | 50.1 /100 | #173 | Average 10.4% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 10.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 49.1 /100 | #175 | Average 10.4% |
French American Indians | 49.1 /100 | #176 | Average 10.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 49.1 /100 | #177 | Average 10.4% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 48.0 /100 | #178 | Average 10.4% |
Ethiopians | 45.8 /100 | #179 | Average 10.5% |
Arabs | 45.3 /100 | #180 | Average 10.5% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 44.1 /100 | #181 | Average 10.5% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 43.8 /100 | #182 | Average 10.5% |