Immigrants from Latin America vs Hmong No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Hmong
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Hmong
10.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
53.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
52.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Hmong No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 543,017,545 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,678,157 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.286 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 0.060%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Hmong |
| Minimum | 0.80% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 34.4% | 37.4% |
| Range | 33.6% | 36.4% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 9.2% |
| Median | 9.6% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America and Hmong by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Lumbee (10.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Brazilian (10.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Filipino (10.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and Indonesian (10.3%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Brazilian (10.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Lumbee (10.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Filipino (10.4%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
| South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |
| Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 60.5 /100 | #166 | Good 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 10.3% |
| Indonesians | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 10.3% |
| Lumbee | 54.7 /100 | #169 | Average 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 10.4% |
| Hmong | 52.7 /100 | #171 | Average 10.4% |
| Brazilians | 51.7 /100 | #172 | Average 10.4% |
| Filipinos | 50.1 /100 | #173 | Average 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 49.1 /100 | #175 | Average 10.4% |
| French American Indians | 49.1 /100 | #176 | Average 10.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 49.1 /100 | #177 | Average 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 48.0 /100 | #178 | Average 10.4% |
| Ethiopians | 45.8 /100 | #179 | Average 10.5% |
| Arabs | 45.3 /100 | #180 | Average 10.5% |