Filipino vs South African No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Filipino
South African
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Filipinos
South Africans
10.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
50.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
61.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Filipino vs South African No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,938,776 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.507 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,340,903 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.777 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 1.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Filipino | South African |
| Minimum | 0.54% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 25.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 24.5% | 98.5% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 10.5% |
| Median | 5.6% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 20.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 19.6% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos and South Africans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Sudan (10.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.4%, a difference of 0.13%), French American Indian (10.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from El Salvador (10.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Brazilian (10.4%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Comanche (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (10.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.3%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cambodia (10.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Austria (10.2%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
| South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |
| Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 60.5 /100 | #166 | Good 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 10.3% |
| Indonesians | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 10.3% |
| Lumbee | 54.7 /100 | #169 | Average 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 10.4% |
| Hmong | 52.7 /100 | #171 | Average 10.4% |
| Brazilians | 51.7 /100 | #172 | Average 10.4% |
| Filipinos | 50.1 /100 | #173 | Average 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 49.1 /100 | #175 | Average 10.4% |
| French American Indians | 49.1 /100 | #176 | Average 10.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 49.1 /100 | #177 | Average 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 48.0 /100 | #178 | Average 10.4% |