Estonian vs Nicaraguan No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Estonian
Nicaraguan
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Estonians
Nicaraguans
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Estonian vs Nicaraguan No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,433,435 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,349,365 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.309 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 1.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Estonian | Nicaraguan |
| Minimum | 0.84% | 0.83% |
| Maximum | 47.6% | 28.8% |
| Range | 46.8% | 27.9% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 9.2% |
| Median | 6.0% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Estonians and Nicaraguans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Immigrants from Syria (9.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Kenya (9.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Icelander (9.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (9.6%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |