Estonian vs Latvian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Estonian
Latvian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Estonians
Latvians
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
85.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Estonian vs Latvian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,433,435 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Estonians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,382,965 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 0.27%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Estonian | Latvian |
| Minimum | 0.84% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 47.6% | 28.8% |
| Range | 46.8% | 28.3% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 7.0% |
| Median | 6.0% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Estonians and Latvians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |