Chippewa vs Immigrants from Chile No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Chile
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Chile
9.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
93.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
15.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Chile No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,718,200 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,421,447 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.316 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 16.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from Chile |
| Minimum | 0.88% | 0.72% |
| Maximum | 38.6% | 23.1% |
| Range | 37.7% | 22.4% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 8.5% |
| Median | 9.5% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Japanese (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Navajo (9.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Serbian (9.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Greek (9.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and Fijian (9.5%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Delaware | 97.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 95.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Armenians | 95.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 94.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Serbians | 94.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Navajo | 94.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Japanese | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Chippewa | 93.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Greeks | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Fijians | 92.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 92.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 92.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Guatemalan (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Sierra Leonean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Pennsylvania German (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
| Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
| Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
| Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
| Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
| Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |
| Apache | 14.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.0% |
| Crow | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 11.0% |