Chilean vs Slavic No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chilean
Slavic
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chileans
Slavs
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Slavic No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,391,797 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 9.0%, a difference of 10.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Slavic |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.74% |
| Maximum | 18.4% | 15.4% |
| Range | 16.7% | 14.7% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 5.8% |
| Median | 7.5% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.3% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Chileans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Bulgarian (9.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Asian (9.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Pakistani (9.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Central America (8.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Yugoslavian (9.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Bulgarians | 98.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Asians | 98.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Pakistanis | 98.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 98.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Seminole | 98.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Spanish Americans | 97.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 9.1% |