Chilean vs Latvian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chilean
Latvian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chileans
Latvians
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
85.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Latvian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,382,965 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 1.0%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Latvian |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 18.4% | 28.8% |
| Range | 16.7% | 28.3% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 7.0% |
| Median | 7.5% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Latvians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |