Chilean vs Sierra Leonean No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chilean
Sierra Leonean
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chileans
Sierra Leoneans
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
15.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Sierra Leonean No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,300,875 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 11.2%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Sierra Leonean |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 18.4% | 20.4% |
| Range | 16.7% | 19.0% |
| Mean | 7.6% | 7.8% |
| Median | 7.5% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Chileans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Somali (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Pennsylvania German (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Guatemalan (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
| Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
| Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
| Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
| Somalis | 15.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.0% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 15.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.0% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 15.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.0% |
| Apache | 14.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.0% |
| Crow | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 12.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 12.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 11.1% |