Chilean vs Marshallese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chilean
 Marshallese
 No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chileans
Marshallese
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Marshallese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,325,892 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,756,387 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.486 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 0.71%.
 
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Marshallese | 
| Minimum | 1.7% | 2.7% | 
| Maximum | 18.4% | 20.0% | 
| Range | 16.7% | 17.3% | 
| Mean | 7.6% | 8.6% | 
| Median | 7.5% | 7.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 13.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 8.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 4.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 4.8% | 
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Marshallese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131  | Excellent 9.7%  | 
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132  | Excellent 9.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133  | Excellent 9.7%  | 
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134  | Excellent 9.7%  | 
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135  | Excellent 9.8%  | 
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136  | Excellent 9.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137  | Excellent 9.8%  | 
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138  | Excellent 9.8%  | 
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139  | Excellent 9.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140  | Excellent 9.8%  | 
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141  | Excellent 9.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142  | Excellent 9.9%  | 
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143  | Excellent 9.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144  | Excellent 9.9%  | 
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145  | Excellent 9.9%  | 
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146  | Excellent 9.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147  | Good 9.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148  | Good 9.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149  | Good 10.0%  | 
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150  | Good 10.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151  | Good 10.0%  |