Japanese vs Latvian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Japanese
Latvian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Japanese
Latvians
9.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
94.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
85.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Latvian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,891,204 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,382,965 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 3.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Latvian |
| Minimum | 3.2% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 36.9% | 28.8% |
| Range | 33.7% | 28.3% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 7.0% |
| Median | 8.9% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Latvians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Navajo (9.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Chippewa (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Greek (9.5%, a difference of 0.72%), Fijian (9.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and Immigrants from Thailand (9.5%, a difference of 0.89%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Syrian (9.7%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Oceania (9.7%, a difference of 0.60%), Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.90%), Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 0.97%), and Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Navajo | 94.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Japanese | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Chippewa | 93.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Greeks | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Fijians | 92.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 92.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 92.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |