Chickasaw vs Swiss No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Swiss
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chickasaw
Swiss
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Swiss No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,788,069 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 0.080%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Swiss |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 15.9% | 65.0% |
| Range | 14.6% | 62.2% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 14.0% |
| Median | 5.5% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Swiss by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and Nonimmigrants (7.9%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.38%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Nonimmigrants (7.9%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Malaysians | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Cherokee | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 8.0% |