Chickasaw vs Venezuelan No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Venezuelan
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chickasaw
Venezuelans
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Venezuelan No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,806,487 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Venezuelans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081 and weighted average of 8.1%, a difference of 3.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Venezuelan |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.90% |
| Maximum | 15.9% | 11.7% |
| Range | 14.6% | 10.8% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 6.3% |
| Median | 5.5% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Venezuelans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Nonimmigrants (7.9%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Venezuelans are Immigrants from Mexico (8.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (8.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from India (8.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Laos (8.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and Celtic (8.1%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Venezuelans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 8.2% |