Chickasaw vs Alaskan Athabascan No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Alaskan Athabascan
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chickasaw
Alaskan Athabascans
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Alaskan Athabascan No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,793,877 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.685 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 98.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 15.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 14.6% | 99.0% |
Mean | 6.1% | 37.7% |
Median | 5.5% | 28.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 66.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 57.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 33.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 32.8% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Israel (15.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Tohono O'odham (15.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Albanian (15.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Cypriot (15.7%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | China | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.4% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.5% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.6% |
Albanians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cypriots | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.7% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.4% |