Pima vs Swiss No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Pima
Swiss
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Pima
Swiss
14.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Swiss No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,491,377 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 14.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,788,069 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 80.0%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Swiss |
Minimum | 2.5% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 29.6% | 65.0% |
Range | 27.1% | 62.2% |
Mean | 14.4% | 14.0% |
Median | 15.3% | 9.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 15.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.3% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 13.1% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Pima by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Okinawan (14.1%, a difference of 0.48%), Indian (Asian) (14.1%, a difference of 0.49%), Immigrants from Jamaica (14.2%, a difference of 0.66%), Belizean (14.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and Paraguayan (14.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 13.6% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 13.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 13.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 14.1% |
Okinawans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 14.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 14.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 14.3% |
Paraguayans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Panama | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 14.6% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 14.7% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Cherokee | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |