Tsimshian vs Inupiat Unemployment
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Inupiat
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Tsimshian
Inupiat
7.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Inupiat Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,625,029 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 7.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,296,891 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 40.1%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Inupiat |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 39.6% |
| Range | 24.3% | 39.2% |
| Mean | 8.9% | 15.9% |
| Median | 6.5% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 24.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 18.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Inupiat by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Alaska Native (7.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Pueblo (7.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Paiute (7.1%, a difference of 1.4%), Yakama (7.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and Dominican (7.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Arapaho (9.8%, a difference of 2.9%), Crow (11.1%, a difference of 9.4%), Yuman (9.1%, a difference of 11.6%), Hopi (8.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and Tohono O'odham (8.9%, a difference of 14.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.3% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.4% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 9.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 11.1% |