Pakistani vs Palestinian Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Pakistani
Palestinian
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Pakistanis
Palestinians
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
80.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Palestinian Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 334,292,014 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,232,493 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.32%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pakistani | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 19.5% | 22.5% |
| Range | 17.8% | 21.5% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 5.6% |
| Median | 5.1% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis and Palestinians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |