Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Palestinian Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Palestinian
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Palestinians
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
80.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Palestinian Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,623,871 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,232,493 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.44%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 0.90% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 13.8% | 22.5% |
| Range | 12.9% | 21.5% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 5.6% |
| Median | 4.9% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Palestinians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 86.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |