Pakistani vs Immigrants from Argentina Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Pakistani
Immigrants from Argentina
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Pakistanis
Immigrants from Argentina
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
78.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Immigrants from Argentina Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 334,292,014 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,999,591 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.143 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.52%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pakistani | Immigrants from Argentina |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.70% |
| Maximum | 19.5% | 11.2% |
| Range | 17.8% | 10.5% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 4.9% |
| Median | 5.1% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis and Immigrants from Argentina by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |