Pakistani vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Pakistani
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Pakistanis
Immigrants from Ethiopia
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
85.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 334,292,014 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,284,920 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.695 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.19%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pakistani | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 19.5% | 68.1% |
| Range | 17.8% | 65.0% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 6.8% |
| Median | 5.1% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis and Immigrants from Ethiopia by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Maltese (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Ethiopian (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chilean (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.2 /100 | #124 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Basques | 86.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 86.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 86.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |