White/Caucasian vs Palestinian Female Unemployment
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Palestinian
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Palestinians
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
80.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Palestinian Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,814,917 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.890 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,232,493 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 5.2%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | White/Caucasian | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 3.8% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 12.8% | 22.5% |
| Range | 9.0% | 21.5% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| Median | 5.9% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 3.3% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Slavic (4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Cambodian (4.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cuba (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Moldova (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Okinawans | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Thais | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Australians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Slavs | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Serbians | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Icelanders | 98.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Bhutanese | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |