Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Argentina Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Immigrants from Argentina
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Immigrants from Argentina
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
78.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Argentina Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 491,024,006 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,999,591 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.143 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.56%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Immigrants from Argentina |
Minimum | 2.9% | 0.70% |
Maximum | 7.6% | 11.2% |
Range | 4.8% | 10.5% |
Mean | 5.0% | 4.9% |
Median | 4.9% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 5.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.98% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.84% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.84% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Immigrants from Argentina by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |