Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Norway Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Immigrants from Norway
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Immigrants from Norway
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Norway Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 491,024,006 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,500,173 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.724 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.50%.

Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Immigrants from Norway |
Minimum | 2.9% | 0.50% |
Maximum | 7.6% | 57.1% |
Range | 4.8% | 56.6% |
Mean | 5.0% | 7.8% |
Median | 4.9% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 5.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.98% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.84% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.84% | 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Immigrants from Norway by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |