Ute vs Chippewa Unemployment
COMPARE
Ute
Chippewa
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Ute
Chippewa
6.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Chippewa Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,641,971 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.528 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,819,653 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%.

Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 42.2% | 50.0% |
| Range | 39.7% | 48.1% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 11.4% |
| Median | 7.3% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Chippewa by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Jamaican (6.3%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Haiti (6.3%, a difference of 0.43%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.3%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from West Indies (6.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (6.2%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Senegalese (6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Ecuadorian (6.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Nepalese (6.2%, a difference of 0.38%), Haitian (6.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and Central American Indian (6.2%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.3% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.4% |