Choctaw vs Tsimshian Male Disability
COMPARE
Choctaw
Tsimshian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Choctaw
Tsimshian
15.4%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Tsimshian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,660,738 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 6.3% | 11.5% |
| Maximum | 44.2% | 30.2% |
| Range | 38.0% | 18.6% |
| Mean | 23.1% | 19.7% |
| Median | 22.8% | 22.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.3% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.0% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 12.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Tsimshian by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Kiowa (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Creek (15.5%, a difference of 0.85%), Puerto Rican (15.6%, a difference of 0.98%), Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Chickasaw (15.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Puerto Rican (15.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Creek (15.5%, a difference of 0.45%), Kiowa (15.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and Chickasaw (15.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.4% |