Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Bhutanese Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Bhutanese
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Bhutanese
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Bhutanese Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,623,871 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,429,173 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.408 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 4.2%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 0.90% | 0.60% |
Maximum | 13.8% | 10.5% |
Range | 12.9% | 9.9% |
Mean | 5.0% | 4.6% |
Median | 4.9% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 5.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.6% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 1.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Korea | 86.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 86.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Scotland (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Canada (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Slavs | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Whites/Caucasians | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Serbians | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Icelanders | 98.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Bhutanese | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 98.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Celtics | 98.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Hungarians | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.9% |