Subsaharan African vs Bhutanese Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Bhutanese
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Bhutanese
5.7%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Bhutanese Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,774,253 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.606 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,429,173 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.408 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 15.9%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 3.1% | 0.60% |
| Maximum | 71.0% | 10.5% |
| Range | 67.9% | 9.9% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 4.6% |
| Median | 6.2% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 1.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Dutch West Indian (5.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.67%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.7%, a difference of 0.71%), Immigrants (5.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and Cajun (5.7%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.0 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 0.8 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 0.8 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Cajuns | 0.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.6 /100 | #253 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 0.6 /100 | #254 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.4 /100 | #256 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Nigerians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Scotland (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Canada (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Slavs | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Serbians | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Icelanders | 98.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Bhutanese | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Celtics | 98.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Hungarians | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.9% |