Yugoslavian vs Israeli Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Israeli
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Yugoslavians
Israelis
16.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
64.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
86.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Israeli Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,961,993 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.422 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,037,528 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.396 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 3.8%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yugoslavian | Israeli |
Minimum | 0.83% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 55.0% |
Range | 99.2% | 53.4% |
Mean | 20.4% | 17.8% |
Median | 16.2% | 12.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.3% | 21.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.1% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.9% | 15.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Costa Rican (16.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Venezuela (16.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
Ethiopians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 45.4 /100 | #175 | Average 16.6% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Canadian (15.6%, a difference of 0.24%), New Zealander (15.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Jordan (15.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |