Welsh vs Immigrants from Philippines Family Poverty
COMPARE
Welsh
Immigrants from Philippines
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Welsh
Immigrants from Philippines
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Immigrants from Philippines Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 525,428,616 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,729,486 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.163 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 0.71%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Welsh | Immigrants from Philippines |
| Minimum | 4.7% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 24.5% |
| Range | 95.3% | 23.5% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 7.7% |
| Median | 9.2% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh and Immigrants from Philippines by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Immigrants from South Africa (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |