Welsh vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Poverty
COMPARE
Welsh
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Welsh
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 525,428,616 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,739,253 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 1.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Welsh | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 4.7% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 15.6% |
| Range | 95.3% | 13.8% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 7.1% |
| Median | 9.2% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Immigrants from South Africa (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Canadian (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from France (8.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Israel (8.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Taiwanese (8.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and South African (8.2%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |