U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
U.S. Virgin Islander
Chinese
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
U.S. Virgin Islanders
Chinese
18.1%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
294th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Chinese Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,675,302 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,120,579 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 17.6%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | U.S. Virgin Islander | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.75% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 60.0% | 85.0% |
| Range | 59.2% | 84.1% |
| Mean | 21.5% | 19.0% |
| Median | 19.0% | 14.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.9% | 23.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.8% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 17.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.9% | 16.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Father Poverty
Demographics Similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Alaska Native (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Yakama (18.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bahamas (18.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Alaskan Athabascan (18.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Seminole (18.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 18.0% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 18.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 18.1% |
| French | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Hungarians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 18.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Ukraine (15.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Congo (15.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Armenian (15.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Oceania (15.4%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Armenians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Brazilians | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Burmese | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Mexican American Indians | 98.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 15.5% |