Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chinese Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Chinese
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Chinese
15.3%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Chinese Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,005,444 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,120,579 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 0.65%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Chinese |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 40.2% | 85.0% |
| Range | 36.6% | 84.1% |
| Mean | 15.9% | 19.0% |
| Median | 14.4% | 14.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.9% | 23.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.1% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 17.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.0% | 16.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Chinese by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Kenyan (15.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Maltese (15.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Turkey (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Japan (15.3%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Ukraine (15.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Congo (15.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Armenian (15.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Oceania (15.4%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Paraguayans | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Japanese | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Mongolians | 99.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Kenyans | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Maltese | 99.6 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Armenians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 15.5% |
| Brazilians | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 15.5% |