Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chinese Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Chinese
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Chinese
15.6%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Chinese Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,124,397 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.321 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,120,579 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 1.1%.

Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | Chinese |
Minimum | 6.7% | 0.92% |
Maximum | 28.4% | 85.0% |
Range | 21.7% | 84.1% |
Mean | 17.6% | 19.0% |
Median | 16.9% | 14.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 23.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 17.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 16.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay and Chinese by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belgium (15.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Yaqui (15.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Zimbabwean (15.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Basque (15.5%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Ukraine (15.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Congo (15.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Armenian (15.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Oceania (15.4%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Tlingit-Haida | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Armenians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Congo | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Peruvians | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Brazilians | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Burmese | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Mexican American Indians | 98.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Basques | 98.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 15.5% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Yaqui | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 15.6% |
Zimbabweans | 98.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.6% |