Ugandan vs South American Indian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Ugandan
South American Indian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Ugandans
South American Indians
12.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs South American Indian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,762,990 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.158 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,904,356 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 1.6%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | South American Indian |
Minimum | 2.3% | 5.4% |
Maximum | 38.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 36.1% | 94.6% |
Mean | 11.1% | 20.7% |
Median | 10.2% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 27.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 17.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 21.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and South American Indians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Iraqi (12.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Morocco (12.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Jordanian (12.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Armenia (12.2%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Ireland (12.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (12.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (12.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and Colombian (12.2%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 96.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Jordanians | 95.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 95.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iraqis | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Ugandans | 94.5 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.3% |