Turkish vs Spanish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Turkish
Spanish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Turks
Spanish
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
28.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Spanish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 414,340,286 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 23.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Spanish |
| Minimum | 0.50% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 71.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 71.4% | 97.1% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 34.8% |
| Median | 11.2% | 24.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 46.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 29.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 26.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 26.4% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Turks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish are Aleut (16.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (16.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from the Azores (16.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and Celtic (17.0%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 34.6 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.8% |
| Arabs | 34.5 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
| Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
| Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
| Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
| Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
| Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |