Turkish vs Marshallese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Turkish
Marshallese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Turks
Marshallese
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Marshallese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,733,335 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 36.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Marshallese |
Minimum | 0.50% | 8.7% |
Maximum | 71.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 71.4% | 91.3% |
Mean | 13.5% | 28.9% |
Median | 11.2% | 19.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 15.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 36.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 21.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 24.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 23.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Turks by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Maltese (13.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Immigrants from Eritrea (18.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Nigerian (18.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Nigeria (18.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Alsatian (18.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Nepalese (18.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |