Turkish vs Okinawan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Turkish
Okinawan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Turks
Okinawans
13.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Okinawan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,627,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420 and weighted average of 13.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,394,168 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 5.2%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Okinawan |
| Minimum | 0.50% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 71.9% | 38.4% |
| Range | 71.4% | 37.9% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 11.1% |
| Median | 11.2% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Okinawans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swedish (13.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Asian (13.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.91%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Burmese (13.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (13.1%, a difference of 0.92%), Bulgarian (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Korea (13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Ireland (12.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |