Tsimshian vs Laotian Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Laotian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Tsimshian
Laotians
14.7%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Laotian Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,568,381 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.502 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,686,525 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.541 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 0.080%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Laotian |
| Minimum | 6.2% | 3.8% |
| Maximum | 42.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 36.2% | 96.2% |
| Mean | 20.8% | 19.4% |
| Median | 17.4% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.9% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.6% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.6% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 17.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Laotians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Russian (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Philippines (14.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Soviet Union (14.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Greece (14.7%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Philippines (14.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Russian (14.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Soviet Union (14.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Greece (14.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.8%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Norwegians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Soviet Union | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Tsimshian | 99.6 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.6 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.5 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.4 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 99.4 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Danes | 99.4 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.9% |