Tsimshian vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Luxembourger
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Tsimshian
Luxembourgers
14.7%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,568,381 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.502 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,046,176 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 14.9%, a difference of 1.2%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 6.2% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 42.3% | 33.3% |
Range | 36.2% | 31.4% |
Mean | 20.8% | 13.4% |
Median | 17.4% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.9% | 8.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.6% | 16.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.6% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 7.4% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Luxembourgers by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Laotian (14.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Russian (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Philippines (14.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Soviet Union (14.7%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Israel (14.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Danish (14.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Egyptian (14.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
Norwegians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Soviet Union | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Tsimshian | 99.6 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.6 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.5 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Luxembourgers | 99.4 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.4 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Danes | 99.4 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Egyptians | 99.4 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Swedes | 99.4 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Paraguayans | 99.4 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 15.0% |