Thai vs Polish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Thai
Polish
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Thais
Poles
11.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Thai vs Polish Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,276,547 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.305 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,484,152 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.323 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 21.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Thai | Polish |
Minimum | 0.97% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 38.0% | 44.4% |
Range | 37.1% | 43.4% |
Mean | 8.0% | 14.9% |
Median | 7.2% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 16.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 7.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Thais by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Tsimshian (11.5%, a difference of 3.0%), Filipino (11.4%, a difference of 3.6%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 4.3%), Chinese (12.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (11.3%, a difference of 4.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Poles by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Cambodian (14.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Scandinavian (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Europe (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Zimbabwean (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Laotians | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |