Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Belarus Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 429,284,128 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 18.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,520,754 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 2.0%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Sri Lankan	Immigrants from Belarus
Minimum	3.3%	2.7%
Maximum	40.0%	69.5%
Range	36.7%	66.9%
Mean	17.3%	19.4%
Median	16.2%	17.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	13.4%	14.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.3%	21.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.0%	7.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.2%	11.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.2%	11.6%

Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Immigrants from Belarus by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Bhutanese (18.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Asian (18.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (18.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Samoan (18.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (18.2%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Greek (18.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Asia (18.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Scotland (18.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Albania (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Brazil (18.5%, a difference of 0.13%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Spanish American Indians	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 18.1%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 18.2%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 18.2%
Sri Lankans	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 18.2%
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 18.2%
Samoans	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 18.2%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	99.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 18.2%
Immigrants \| Ireland	99.9 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 18.3%
Italians	99.9 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 18.3%
Immigrants \| Egypt	99.9 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 18.4%
Albanians	99.9 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 18.4%
Argentineans	99.9 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 18.4%
Immigrants \| Italy	99.9 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 18.4%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	99.9 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 18.4%
Egyptians	99.9 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 18.5%
Immigrants \| Brazil	99.8 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 18.5%
Immigrants \| Albania	99.8 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 18.5%
Greeks	99.8 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 18.5%
Immigrants \| Belarus	99.8 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 18.5%
Immigrants \| Asia	99.8 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 18.6%
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 18.6%