Soviet Union vs Palestinian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Palestinian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Soviet Union
Palestinians
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
91.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Palestinian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,419,717 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.166 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,628,863 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 0.21%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Palestinian |
Minimum | 0.48% | 0.73% |
Maximum | 11.4% | 15.1% |
Range | 10.9% | 14.3% |
Mean | 3.9% | 5.3% |
Median | 3.4% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 6.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Palestinians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Pakistan (4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Puget Sound Salish (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Kenya (4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Samoan (4.9%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Immigrants from Pakistan (4.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Puget Sound Salish (4.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Egyptian (4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Kenya (4.9%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Romanians | 92.5 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 92.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 92.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Egyptians | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Palestinians | 91.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.7 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Soviet Union | 90.7 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.4 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |