Somali vs Osage Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Somali
 Osage
 Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Somalis
Osage
25.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
24.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Somali vs Osage Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,025,014 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594 and weighted average of 25.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,495,293 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132 and weighted average of 24.4%, a difference of 3.3%.
 
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Somali | Osage | 
| Minimum | 7.2% | 10.2% | 
| Maximum | 54.5% | 50.0% | 
| Range | 47.2% | 39.8% | 
| Mean | 26.3% | 29.5% | 
| Median | 23.0% | 30.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.9% | 23.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.8% | 35.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 12.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 9.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 9.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Somalis and Osage by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Immigrants from Congo (25.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (25.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.38%), Shoshone (25.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Honduran (25.1%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Alsatian (24.5%, a difference of 0.37%), American (24.5%, a difference of 0.44%), French American Indian (24.6%, a difference of 0.59%), Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and U.S. Virgin Islander (24.2%, a difference of 0.94%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty | 
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287  | Tragic 24.2%  | 
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288  | Tragic 24.2%  | 
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289  | Tragic 24.2%  | 
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290  | Tragic 24.3%  | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291  | Tragic 24.4%  | 
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292  | Tragic 24.5%  | 
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293  | Tragic 24.5%  | 
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294  | Tragic 24.6%  | 
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295  | Tragic 24.6%  | 
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296  | Tragic 24.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297  | Tragic 24.8%  | 
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298  | Tragic 24.9%  | 
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299  | Tragic 25.0%  | 
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300  | Tragic 25.1%  | 
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301  | Tragic 25.1%  | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302  | Tragic 25.1%  | 
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303  | Tragic 25.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304  | Tragic 25.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305  | Tragic 25.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306  | Tragic 25.3%  | 
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307  | Tragic 25.4%  |