Immigrants from Chile vs Ethiopian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Ethiopian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Ethiopians
20.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Chile vs Ethiopian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,927,645 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,686,273 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 0.93%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Chile | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 4.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 33.2% |
| Range | 98.2% | 28.4% |
| Mean | 25.7% | 18.6% |
| Median | 19.7% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.8% | 20.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.5% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.9% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Ethiopians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Brazilian (20.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (20.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South America (20.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Switzerland (20.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and South American (20.0%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Western Asia (19.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Brazilians | 94.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 94.3 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 93.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 20.1% |