Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Female Poverty
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
93.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,146,424 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,784,385 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 0.56%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 0.23% |
| Maximum | 26.7% | 23.3% |
| Range | 23.1% | 23.1% |
| Mean | 13.0% | 11.0% |
| Median | 13.0% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Welsh (12.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Russia (12.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.7%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Laotian (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Turkey (12.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |